Successful learning and three ingredients needed to ensure successful Essay

Successful learning and three ingredients needed to ensure successful learning - Essay Example From the study it can be comprehended that a lot of psychologists, educationalists and researchers have put forward various models that aim at successful and improved learning. One of such models was put forward by Dr. David McClelland who recommends three ingredients needed to ensure successful learning: wanting to learn, knowing how to learn and having a chance to learn. The desire to learn is not far from right to place first on the ladder of three ingredients needed to ensure successful learning by Dr. David McClelland. Indeed the fact that a person must want or desire to learn goes to confirm the saying that where there is a will, there is a way. The desire or want to learn serves as a stimulus that sustains the learner through out the learning period. Next to a strong want to learn, it is very important that a learner possesses a great depth of knowhow when it comes to learning. One may ask, â€Å"What does it mean to know how to learn?† The fact that it is possible for someone to know how to learn and for another person not to know how to learn means that learning is more of an ‘act’ than an event. it is important that a person gets the chance to learn. This is to say that the first two factors put forward by Dr. David McClelland are only preliminary factors that lead to the actual act of learning. So after one acquires the want to learn and gets to understand how to learn, the fellow needs to follow these with an actual act of learning, which means gaining the chance to learn.... may ask, â€Å"What does it mean to know how to learn?† The fact that it is possible for someone to know how to learn and for another person not to know how to learn means that learning is more of an ‘act’ than an event. Learning is an act such like swimming, gymnastics and cooking. If you do not know how to do it, you will do it poorly. First, it is important to mention that learning is an individual act and that different people learn best through different means. For this reason, any person who would be tagged as a person who knows how to learn must first be a person who knows and understands him or her own self. As a typical example with my personal learning experience, I am able to determine factors such as the best time to learn, the right learning methodologies that works best, the length of time to learn, the type of subject to begin learning with and other factors of the sort. By knowing these factors, I have always succeeded in learning because he or she is going to apply to him or herself, the most appropriate rudiments of learning. Having a chance to learn – 150 After it is all said and done, it is important that a person gets the chance to learn. This is to say that the first two factors put forward by Dr. David McClelland are only preliminary factors that lead to the actual act of learning. So after one acquires the want to learn and gets to understand how to learn, the fellow needs to follow these with an actual act of learning, which means gaining the chance to learn. Putting into practice the first two factors without the having the chance to learn is like training so hard for a soccer match that never was. To this effect, it is important that every learner is presented with an opportunity to learn. Conclusion - 100 To conclude, it is important

In Preventing a Brave New World (pp. 317-329), Leon Kass concludes Essay

In Preventing a Brave New World (pp. 317-329), Leon Kass concludes that reproductive and therapeutic cloning of human embryos - Essay Example He points out that â€Å"revulsion† (Kass, 2001) is not the basis of his argument as he points out that â€Å"repugnance† (Kass, 2001) of the past is silently accepted in the present. He moreover observes that disgust is not something that is emotional and hence he is not being emotional when he criticizes the cloning of the human embryos but it is a deep thought into the matter makes him talk against the mechanism. He compares cloning with the incest relationships and other unethical activities like disfigurement of corpse or feeding on human flesh. Kass observes that as murder, rape or bestiality cannot be ethically justified, in the same manner reproductive and therapeutic cloning of human embryos stands unjustified on the ground of ethics. Kass (2001), in his composition, says that cloning is resisted not only because it is strange to take up something like this but because he â€Å"intuit† that it is not novel and cloning for him is the violation of things t hat he dearly holds. In the book he criticizes cloning on the grounds of unethical experimentation, threatening the identity of human being and his or her individuality, transforming the essence of procreation into manufacturing. He also argues against it on the ground of despotism that it heralds on the children, thereby becoming the harbinger of parenthood perversion. He makes sure he is not misinterpreted when he is arguing against cloning. He points out that he is against the creation of reproductive cloning and not against the cloning that is used for the research work (Kass, 2001). On ethical grounds Kass argues that the cloning experiment has an adverse and unethical effect on the child to be born. Its not that they would be only affected adversely on the ethical grounds there can serious dangers to their life, as the experiment of cloning has failed mostly among the animals. Incidents of fetal deaths and the deaths of the stillborn infants cannot be avoided in the process of cloning. He also points out that the so called proclaimed successes are actually failure. It has also been revealed very recently that there remains a high chance of disability and deformity among the cloned animals that lives after birth. He justifies his argument by citing examples of clone crows which has heart and lungs problems and cloned mice which develops pathological obesity later on in its life span. It has been also observed that a cloned animal fails in attaining normal development milestones. Though he argues on the ethical grounds of relationships and the associated problem that would arise from cloning he actually argues on a strong scientific and logical terms. His argument against cloning stands justified on the basis of the facts and figures that have been provided by him (Kass, 2001). He also puts forward an argument on the basis of identity and individuality crisis. It will be like a dilemma for the person who has been cloned, as not only will he have concerns a bout his distinguishing characteristics but also that he will have an identical appearance as his father or mother. This would lead to serious identity crisis. He indicates the adverse effect that a homey case can have if engaged in infra familial cloning. Cloning of the husband and the wife gives birth to a twin parent child relation. Eventually no parent will be competent to take care of the clone of himself or herself as one treats his or her own child. This creates a series of perplexity in the relationship, the way they are perceived. Like if the daughter is the clone of